Discover which agile framework — Scrum or Kanban — is best suited for your organization!

►

Introduction

Are you torn between Scrum and Kanban for managing your projects? These two agile approaches share many principles but also have key differences. In this article, fully inspired by the video below, we will review their common points, then compare their operating modes, ceremonies, and ideal use cases.

Common Points Between Scrum and Kanban

1. Agile framework: both are based on the values of the Agile Manifesto (iteration, adaptation, collaboration).
2. Pull system: we don’t overload the team; as soon as capacity is freed up, we "pull" the next task from the backlog.
3. Transparency: the work board (To Do / In Progress / Done columns) is visible to all, promoting communication.
4. Continuous improvement: regular retrospectives to adjust the process.
5. Iterative deliveries: each cycle delivers a value increment.
6. Prioritization and adaptation: we work on the highest-priority items first and adjust based on client feedback.

Kanban: Flow and Flexibility

• No sprints or imposed roles: you choose which ceremonies (daily, retrospective, review) and how often.
• Continuous flow: tasks move forward without time slicing, from the "Backlog" column to "Done".
• Work in Progress (WIP) limitation: you set a maximum number of tasks in progress to avoid overload and increase focus.
• Add tasks at any time from a prioritized backlog.
• Use cases: ideal for support teams, maintenance, or any project where priorities continuously evolve, and flexibility is key.

Scrum: Structure and Cadence

• Sprints (1–4 week cycles): each sprint starts with a Sprint Planning where the team commits to User Stories taken from the Product Backlog and listed in the Sprint Backlog.
• Predefined roles:
  • Product Owner (prioritization, client liaison)
  • Scrum Master (facilitation, removing obstacles)
  • Development Team (self-organizing)
• Fixed ceremonies: Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective.
• Sprint tracking: a board (To Do / In Progress / Done) or a Burndown Chart is used to visualize progress.
• Use cases: suitable for projects that require clear structure, regular delivery cadence, and strong visibility for stakeholders.

How to Choose?

• Choose Scrum if you need a regular cadence, clear roles, and team commitment to fixed periods.
• Opt for Kanban if your context requires reactivity, continuous flow, and you prefer to adapt the process without strict time frames.